rebeccawilde: (Default)
I am currently reading Zero Degrees of Empathy: a New Theory of Human Cruelty by Simon Baron-Cohen.  It's a very interesting and insightful book which I believe many people would benefit from reading.

I wanted to share the following article by Simon Baron-Cohen. It's adapted from his book and appeared in The Observer. 

The science of empathy

Does it upset you when you see people arguing? Do you cry at the cinema? Empathy is one of our most powerful emotions yet society has all but ignored it. 


When I was seven years old, my father told me the Nazis had turned Jews into lampshades. Just one of those comments you hear once and the thought never goes away. To a child's mind – even to an adult's – these two types of thing just don't belong together. He also told me the Nazis turned Jews into bars of soap. It sounds so unbelievable, yet it is actually true. I knew our family was Jewish, so this image of turning people into objects felt a bit close to home.

Years later, I was teaching at St Mary's Hospital Medical School in London. I sat in on a lecture on physiology. The professor was teaching about human adaptation to temperature. He told the students the best data available on human adaptation to extreme cold had been collected by Nazi scientists performing "immersion experiments" on Jews and other inmates of Dachau concentration camp, who they put into vats of freezing water. They collected systematic data on how heartrate correlated with time, at zero degrees centigrade.

Hearing about this unethical research retriggered that same question in my mind: how can humans treat other people as objects? How do humans come to switch off their natural feelings of sympathy for a fellow human being who is suffering?

The standard explanation is that the Holocaust (sadly echoed in many cultures historically across the globe) is an example of the "evil" that humans are capable of inflicting on one another. Evil is treated as incomprehensible, a topic that cannot be dealt with because the scale of the horror is so great that nothing can convey its enormity. But, when you hold up the concept of evil to examine it, it is no explanation at all. For a scientist this is, of course, wholly inadequate.

As a scientist I want to understand the factors causing people to treat others as if they are mere objects. So let's substitute the term "evil" with the term "empathy erosion". Empathy erosion can arise because of corrosive emotions, such as bitter resentment, or desire for revenge, or blind hatred, or desire to protect. In theory these are transient emotions, the empathy erosion is reversible. But empathy erosion can be the result of more permanent psychological characteristics.

Unempathic acts are simply the tail end of a bell curve, found in every population on the planet. If we want to replace the term "evil" with the term "empathy", we have to understand empathy closely. The key idea is that we all lie somewhere on an empathy spectrum. People said to be "evil" or cruel are simply at one extreme of the empathy spectrum. We can all be lined up along this spectrum of individual differences, based on how much empathy we have. At one end of this spectrum we find "zero degrees of empathy".

Zero degrees of empathy means you have no awareness of how you come across to others, how to interact with others, or how to anticipate their feelings or reactions. It leaves you feeling mystified by why relationships don't work out, and it creates a deep-seated self-centredness. Other people's thoughts and feelings are just off your radar. It leaves you doomed to do your own thing, in your own little bubble, not just oblivious of other people's feelings and thoughts but oblivious to the idea that there might even be other points of view. The consequence is that you believe 100% in the rightness of your own ideas and beliefs, and judge anyone who does not hold your beliefs as wrong, or stupid.

Read more... )
rebeccawilde: (Default)
I like the news article in this months issue of Scientific American Mind (a magazine I buy regularly from Wh Smith, because I love it!).

Apparently, if we are looking at a photo of a loved one while we are in pain the intensity of that pain lessens. Images of attractive acquaintances were not very effective painkillers, but gazing at the faces of significant others reduced reported pain on average between 36 and 44 percent and high pain between 12 and 13 percent. The study subjects were caused varying degrees of pain via heat pads attached to their skin, while laying in an MRI machine during the tests - carried out at Stanford University by Neuroscientist Jarred Younger. Isn't it truly fascinating: love not only can emotionally heal us but it can also protect us from actual pain.

I also liked the article about beliefs, here is what it said: People preaching their point of view seem awfully sure of themselves. But we often try hardest to persuade when our confidence has been shaken, suggests an October study in Psychological Science. In the experiment, volunteers wrote essays aimed at strangers about their views on animal testing or dietary preference. When the subjects’ confidence was first challenged by recalling experiences that made them feel uncertain or having to write with their nondominant hand, they wrote longer essays. Because we define ourselves largely by our beliefs, the researchers say, we try to shore up our self-confidence by convincing others to see it our way.

I have thought for some time that people that push their beliefs on others, or shout loudly in disagreement of others differing view points, do so because they are feeling - personally - under attack, as they feel unsure of themselves and their own beliefs. This study, in a way, points to that being correct. Interesting!

---

I’ve had a very nice week, going for long walks and generally feeling fairly happy.

Yesterday, I had a little scare when two of the tiniest baby bunnies I have ever seen hopped out into the path of the car, while I was being driven home from Richmond Park. Thankfully, John managed to steer away from them just in time and the little darlings, a little startled, ran off into some undergrowth. Hopefully that was enough to teach them that roads are not safe.

Profile

rebeccawilde: (Default)
rebeccawilde

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
8 91011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 19th, 2025 02:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios